Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03586
Original file (BC 2014 03586.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 				DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03586

  							COUNSEL:  NONE

							HEARING DESIRED:  NO 


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Home of Record (HOR) reflect the Philippines rather than 
Henderson, NV.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He desires his HOR to reflect his place of birth.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the 
grade of master sergeant.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or an injustice.  DPSIPE states the DD Form 4, 
Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United 
States, is the source document for HOR and Place of Entry (POE).  
The Joint Federal Travel Regulation (JFTR), volume 1, appendix Al, 
part 1, states, “The place recorded as the home of the individual 
when reinstated, reappointed, or reenlisted remains the same as 
that recorded when commission, appointed, enlisted or inducted, or 
ordered into the tour of active duty, unless there is a break in 
service of more than one full day.  Only if a break in service 
exceeds one full day; may the member change the HOR.”  The HOR is 
the location identified by the individual upon entering the 
service, not a location where the individual is later assigned or 
a location selected for convenience; a correction must be fully 
justified.  Domicile or legal residence may change, but the HOR 
will not.  AFPC Enlisted Accessions Branch was able to confirm 
that the applicant initialed the DD Form 4 listing Henderson, NV, 
as his HOR.

After a thorough review of the applicant’s military personnel 
record and other supporting documentation, there appears to not be 
an error or injustice in determining this applicant’s HOR 
justifying a change. 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIPE evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation(s) was forwarded to the 
applicant on 18 December 2014 for review and comment within 
30 days (Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been 
received by this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion 
the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.






The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-03586 in Executive Session on 30 April 2015, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:


The following documentary evidence was considered:

  Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 27 August 2014, w/atchs.
  Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Available Master Personnel Record.
  Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIPE, dated 18 November 2014,
  Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 December 2014.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02309

    Original file (BC 2014 02309.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial. AFPC Enlisted Accessions Branch confirmed that the applicant initialed the DD Form 4, dated 28 June 2002, listing Las Vegas, NV as his HOR. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01311

    Original file (BC 2014 01311.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01311 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed to reflect New Orleans, LA. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial indicating...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02082

    Original file (BC 2014 02082.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02082 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed to Branson, Missouri. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial indicating there...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02416

    Original file (BC 2014 02416.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. There is no error or injustice that would justify a change in the applicant’s HOR. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02696

    Original file (BC 2014 02696.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. They confirmed that the applicant initialed his DD Form 4, dated 13 Sep 05, which lists Largo, Florida as his HOR. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01593

    Original file (BC 2014 01593.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01593 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Place of Enlistment (POE) and Home of Record (HOR) be corrected to reflect Desoto, Texas 75115. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01094

    Original file (BC 2014 01094.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    According to the applicant’s DD Form 4/1, Enlistment/ Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, at the time of entry, his HOR was recorded as . The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. We took notice of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03485

    Original file (BC 2014 03485.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03485 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His home of record (HOR) be changed from Sun City, Arizona (AZ) to Lake Arrowhead, California (CA). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 04047

    Original file (BC 2014 04047.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04047 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home or Record (HOR) be corrected to reflect North Carolina on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00062

    Original file (BC 2014 00062.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Texas has been her legal permanent home state since 1964. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 September 2014.